The issue of jurisprudential stagnation (al-jumūd al-fiqhī) represents a critical intellectual challenge for the Muslim Ummah, severely impacting the dynamic nature of Islamic law. While the classical jurisprudential heritage provides fundamental guidance for complex issues emerging in the medical, economic, and social spheres of the modern age, the absence of renewed ijtihad (independent legal reasoning) adapted to changing circumstances constitutes a significant gap. This research analyzes the causes of jurisprudential stagnation and presents a comprehensive practical methodology for reviving ijtihad in the contemporary era, particularly through collective ijtihad (al-ijtihād al-jamā‘ī) as a viable solution. The study employs a descriptive and analytical methodology, examining authoritative jurisprudential sources, resolutions of contemporary fiqh academies, and modern scholarly research. The findings indicate that institutional and collective ijtihad proves more effective in addressing modern problems compared to individual ijtihad. The research concludes that the elimination of intellectual stagnation remains impossible until jurisprudential institutions operate through mutual collaboration between eminent religious scholars and experts in modern sciences.